Be at one with nature, they say. Getting out in that green space certainly does wonders for us – medical experts can prove it. But being among animals also means they can have an interesting influence on your game, as this email explains.
“We have a lot of Canadageeseon our course from around the beginning of September,” our questioner explained. “They leave a lot of droppings on the course.
“I understand the droppings are considered a loose impediment but if they adhere to the ball on the fairway, can we clean the ball or do we have to play it as it lies?”
Can you get relief from animal droppings?
You’ve found your ball in the, well, you know. What can you do? Our emailer is right that animal waste is a loose impediment.
So, you can remove droppings – in any way – while making sure the ball doesn’t move while you are doing so. If it does, it’s normally a one-shot penalty and you must replace the ball on its original spot as outlined by Rule 15.1a and 15.1b.
But animal waste is not a loose impediment if it is either “attached” or “sticking to the ball”. What now? Do you have to hit your shot with a goose’s digested dinner splattered all over it?
Usually, but not always. Let’s say that an entire flock has migrated to your club, and there are areas of the course that are covered in cr… [stop right now – Ed].
If there is a concern about the effect of animal dung on fair play, a committee can bring in a Local Rule – Model Local Rule F-12 – that gives a player the option of also treating the droppings as ground under repair.
In that case, and if you so chose, you’d be allowed free relief under Rule 16.1 from an abnormal course condition.
Remember, interference exists if your ball touches, or is in, or on, an abnormal course condition, if it physically interferes with your area of intended stance or swing or, when your ball is on the green, if such a condition or on off the putting surface “intervenes on the line of play”.
The Local Rule needs to specify the type of dung from which relief would be given – the rule book gives the example of goose or dog.
It also allows, going back to the putting surface, the use of a greens switch or whip to remove it from the line of play.
In this instance, if removing it improved the line of play, “or other conditions affecting the stroke”, there would not be a penalty under Rule 8.1a.
Can animal droppings count as evidence for an animal hole?
You sometimes hear players talking about droppings, or scrapings, around a ball and that is claimed as evidence of an animal hole. I think it dates back to the old rules when there was a definition for ‘burrowing animals’, and particularly the ‘cast or runway made by a burrowing animal’.
But unless the Model Local Rule above applies, there is no relief for animal droppings around an animal hole, and neither can they count as evidence for one. The ball is either in an animal hole, or it isn’t, and you’re either interfered with by the animal hole or you are not.
Got a question for our expert?
Despite the changes to the Rules of Golf in 2019 and 2023, there are still some that leave us scratching our heads. I’ll try to help by featuring the best of your queries in this column.
What do you think about these animal droppings rules? Let us know in the comments below, or by leaving a comment onX.
